<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Artists Lane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artistslane.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artistslane.com</link>
	<description>Freshest contemporary artists news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:58:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Preview: Portland Art Museum&#8217;s special exhibition schedule &#8211; OregonLive.com by LaValle</title>
		<link>http://artistslane.com/preview-portland-art-museums-special-exhibition-schedule-oregonlive-com/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>LaValle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://www.oregonlive.com/art/index.ssf/2009/12/preview_portland_art_museums_s.html#comment-504</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really looking forward to the Rothko exhibit in 2012. Hopefully the collector who owns Homage to Matisse will loan it to the museum again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really looking forward to the Rothko exhibit in 2012. Hopefully the collector who owns Homage to Matisse will loan it to the museum again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FRANCE: DOLLS TO FUND DARFUR VACCINATIONS &#8211; IPS-Inter Press Service Europa by Colleen</title>
		<link>http://artistslane.com/france-dolls-to-fund-darfur-vaccinations-ips-inter-press-service-europa/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://www.ipseurope.org/news/news.php?key1=2009-11-10%2019:02:17&key2=1#comment-210</guid>
		<description>the international community should be more proactive in dealing with the situation in Darfur. we should not only send food aids but we also need to influence the political policies in the Darfur region            `</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the international community should be more proactive in dealing with the situation in Darfur. we should not only send food aids but we also need to influence the political policies in the Darfur region            `</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pete and Repeat at 176 Gallery, review &#8211; Telegraph.co.uk by Spiritual Curator</title>
		<link>http://artistslane.com/pete-and-repeat-at-176-gallery-review-telegraph-co-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiritual Curator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-reviews/6455469/Pete-and-Repeat-at-176-Gallery-review.html#comment-182</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s fun and interesting to note that artists, such as Richard Prince, who would like to argue that copying, in and of itself, is art, limit the number of copies they produce of their copies (he usually does editions of 2)...this, of course is done for market concerns (limited number of copies increases the prices he can charge).  Seems like a self-defeating proposition.  What&#039;s to actually stop other&#039;s from making additional copies?  Would Richard mind if those copies bore his signature?  Why not, that would be an expression of art as well!  Hey, everybody can be a millionaire!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fun and interesting to note that artists, such as Richard Prince, who would like to argue that copying, in and of itself, is art, limit the number of copies they produce of their copies (he usually does editions of 2)&#8230;this, of course is done for market concerns (limited number of copies increases the prices he can charge).  Seems like a self-defeating proposition.  What&#8217;s to actually stop other&#8217;s from making additional copies?  Would Richard mind if those copies bore his signature?  Why not, that would be an expression of art as well!  Hey, everybody can be a millionaire!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
